“We should abandon the notion of history as a court eternally in session.” – Archbishop Gianfranco Ravasi, in response to the question whether the Catholic church should posthumously apologize to Darwin, as a senior British prelate has suggested the Church of England might do.
Your Host:
- David Schütz Melbourne, Australia Peccator apud peccatores, et insanus apud insanos
Email
Other Stuff
- First time Commentators click here before posting!
- Other Stuff
- Catholic priesthood crisis
- Catholic Theological College Bible Lands Study Tour 2012
- Extracts from the Manual on Indulgences (2006)
- MacKillop-Woods Way Pilgrimage 2016-2021
- My Anima Education course notes
- My Articles
- “How to live best alongside Muslims in Australia”
- “The Very Heart of the Gospel” – Pope Francis, Evangelii Gaudium
- Council of Christians and Jews: “Same-Sex Marriage” Panel – Presentation by David Schütz
- Ecumenism, Interfaith Dialogue and the New Evangelisation
- Evangelisation and Proselytisation
- Passover meets Easter
- Response to a further enquiry on “How Jesus the Faithful Jew became the Christ of Christian Faith”
- Response to Paul Forgasz on “How Jesus the Faithful Jew became the Christ of Christian Faith”
- The Christian Hope and Christian Dialogue with Jews (2013)
- The New Evangelisation – Presentation to the National Conference of the Catholic Women’s League of Australia
- The Schütz Model for a Elective Australian Constitutional Monarchy
- What is the Gospel? Some analytic thoughts
- My Aussie Camino – The Inaugural MacKillop-Woods Way Pilgrimage (April 2014)
- My Essays On Liturgical Music and Song
- My Interviews
- My Reviews
- Prayers for the Burial of a Pet
- The Aussie Camino
- To the Holy Door: A Pilgrimage of Mercy (December 13)
- Who is Schütz?
Disclaimer
All opinions on this page expressed by the blog owner are those of the blog owner alone, and are in no way to be taken as the opinions of the Catholic Archdiocese of Melbourne or its agencies.
Any opinion on this page expressed by a visiting commentator is the opinion of that commentator alone and is in no way to be taken as the opinion of the blog owner.
I hope that is clear enough for everyone?
About This Blog
Sentire Cum Ecclesia began years ago back when blogs were the latest thing. They are a bit passe now, and I spend most of my time on twitter (@scecclesia) but from time to time, I do add new things on this ‘ere website. Mostly I use it as a place for journaling about my Pilgrimage experiences.
The motto of the blog is:
“Maior autem his est spes”Subscribe to Email Updates
Archives
. . . the question whether the Catholic church should posthumously apologize to Darwin . . .
Apologise for what?
Exactly.
I must admit that I’m more interested in the quote.
Surely history is a critcal examination of the past?
Yes, the quote is of interest to me. I don’t know about history being “a critical examination of the past”. I conceive of the historians job as more of a story teller than a judges or jury.
Sounds a bit lame David: ‘Once upon a time there was a man called Adolf …’ ;-)
To me just choosing a legal metaphor sounds defensive.
Your example is lame, Tony. An historian only needs to record the actions of Hitler as accurately as possible and the man’s evil will be at once seen by all right-thinking people.
What’s the point of telling the story, David, if we’re not going to make judgments, draw conclusions, etc? History is our own story; we examine it because we hope to understand ourselves, to learn about ourselves and to improve ourselves.
I think Archbishop Ravasi’s point is that we examine the history of (in this instance) the encounter between Darwin and the church, not for the purpose of finding which (if either) of them was at fault and exacting some kind of (in this case, symbolic) restitution, but for the purpose of learning, and of bringing what we learn to bear in our own lives, and in our own times.
Darwin is actually a useful example, because the Catholic church had previously faced an analogous situation with Galileo, had handled it very badly and had learned from that experience, with the result that the handled Darwin and his ideas differently, and did nothing which, even now, would be seen to be a matter requiring apology. But you don’t learn those kinds of lessons unless you’re open to reflecting on history.
“We examine history…for the purpose of learning, and of bringing what we learn to bear in our own lives, and in our own times.”
Well, I would say that is exactly why we tell stories too, ol’ boy.
You need to catch up on the more recent approaches to the historical endeavour–which is very much in terms of “narrative”. Of course, the way in which the “narrative” is told is the important thing in terms of what we learn from the story.
Peregrinus: We examine history…for the purpose of learning, and of bringing what we learn to bear in our own lives, and in our own times.
Schutz: Well, I would say that is exactly why we tell stories too, ol’ boy.
Well, how is that not a critical process?