Many of you are probably wondering why I haven’t made any comment about the Seminar on Pius XII held at Temple Beth Israel on Sunday May 5th with Dr Paul O’Shea. The reason is simply because the hosts of the event, the Council of Christians and Jews and the B’nai B’rith, are currently working on writing up an article for publication reporting the matter. Also, we have recorded the event, and in due time a transcript will be made available. But these things take a little time when working cooperatively, and I will post the links to the article and the transcript when it becomes available.
Your Host:
- David Schütz Melbourne, Australia Peccator apud peccatores, et insanus apud insanos
Email
Other Stuff
- First time Commentators click here before posting!
- Other Stuff
- Catholic priesthood crisis
- Catholic Theological College Bible Lands Study Tour 2012
- Extracts from the Manual on Indulgences (2006)
- MacKillop-Woods Way Pilgrimage 2016-2021
- My Anima Education course notes
- My Articles
- “How to live best alongside Muslims in Australia”
- “The Very Heart of the Gospel” – Pope Francis, Evangelii Gaudium
- Council of Christians and Jews: “Same-Sex Marriage” Panel – Presentation by David Schütz
- Ecumenism, Interfaith Dialogue and the New Evangelisation
- Evangelisation and Proselytisation
- Passover meets Easter
- Response to a further enquiry on “How Jesus the Faithful Jew became the Christ of Christian Faith”
- Response to Paul Forgasz on “How Jesus the Faithful Jew became the Christ of Christian Faith”
- The Christian Hope and Christian Dialogue with Jews (2013)
- The New Evangelisation – Presentation to the National Conference of the Catholic Women’s League of Australia
- The Schütz Model for a Elective Australian Constitutional Monarchy
- What is the Gospel? Some analytic thoughts
- My Aussie Camino – The Inaugural MacKillop-Woods Way Pilgrimage (April 2014)
- My Essays On Liturgical Music and Song
- My Interviews
- My Reviews
- Prayers for the Burial of a Pet
- The Aussie Camino
- To the Holy Door: A Pilgrimage of Mercy (December 13)
- Who is Schütz?
Disclaimer
All opinions on this page expressed by the blog owner are those of the blog owner alone, and are in no way to be taken as the opinions of the Catholic Archdiocese of Melbourne or its agencies.
Any opinion on this page expressed by a visiting commentator is the opinion of that commentator alone and is in no way to be taken as the opinion of the blog owner.
I hope that is clear enough for everyone?
About This Blog
Sentire Cum Ecclesia began years ago back when blogs were the latest thing. They are a bit passe now, and I spend most of my time on twitter (@scecclesia) but from time to time, I do add new things on this ‘ere website. Mostly I use it as a place for journaling about my Pilgrimage experiences.
The motto of the blog is:
“Maior autem his est spes”Subscribe to Email Updates
Archives
I attended the seminar on Pope Pius XII and the Shoah and found it informative. It was a little frustrating as we cannot presently get to a definitive record of Pius during World War II. As Paul O’Shea’s scholarship as a historian is an ongoing one regarding Pius XII, the world will have to await the time of the release of all of the archival documents regarding this most important historical epoch, from the Vatican archives.
What I cannot understand about Pius XII is the silence on the issue of the Shoah after the death of Adolf Hitler and the total collapse of the Third Reich in 1945 to Pius XII’s death in 1958. This was a period of approximately thirteen years. Why didn’t Pius XII hold an international press conference to completely discuss the Shoah, the Third Reich, and his role during such an important historical moment of the 20th century? Maybe he did say or write something and I am not aware of it. Can anyone educate me?
I don’t think it was Pius’ style to hold “press conferences”. Audiences, yes; press conference, no. I don’t think we folk today can actually “get” Pius XII without getting inside the shoes of a bloke who, by the end of his life, had reached a rather exalted and mystical understanding of his role within the Church.
Granted that he did not do press conferences; he could have chosen one or two journalists that were accredited to the Vatican, and given his story to the world in this way. Failing this, he could have written an encyclical on the matter, or authored a book. He even could have written a personal diary or left a more formal record for posterity, which would have eventually been released via the Vatican archives.
The Shoah is no ordinary event. I am absolutely convinced that Pope Pius XII would have viewed the European catastrophe in similar terms. Of course as Dr. Paul O’Shea explained, the currently understood record of Pius XII, the Shoah, and the Third Reich is a murky shade of grey. He is not an absolute clean skin but neither was he the devil incarnate. He despised Hitler and the Nazis and he helped where he could to save as many Jews as possible. He came to the papacy as a veteran Vatican diplomat and this partly informs us all as to his basic modus operandi.
His concerns for and his prioritising of the Catholic Church in terms of its clergy, laity, and property throughout Europe during this calamitous time, are quite understandable. Whilst he had these constant concerns, Pope Pius XII and the church saved many Jews by relying on Catholic and diplomatic networks in order to do so.
I have two questions for Dr. Paul O’Shea, or anyone else for that matter. Firstly, why did Pius XII continue to be faithful to the Concordat between the Vatican and the Third Reich, which was signed on the 20th July 1933, after Hitler did not remain beholden to it? Secondly, did Pope Pius XII say or write anything about the Shoah after the death of Hitler and the demise of the third Reich between 1945 and Pius’s death in 1958? Both of these questions might have to await the release of further archival material pertinent to these matters. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reichskonkordat
As the case for the merits of the beatification of Pius XII has commenced, I would have thought that it would have been in the interests of the Roman Catholic Church and the contemporary interreligious dialogue between the church and Judaism, for all archival material relating to Pope Pius XII, the Catholic Church, the Shoah, and the Third Reich, be completely released in as prompt a manner as possible. Such a release would have the double effect of assisting those in the Vatican who are authorised to rigorously examine the merits of his beatification, and for the Catholic Church to maintain good relations with our Jewish brothers and sisters.
The archival material is currently being prepared for release around 2014.
I suspect that Pius XII didn’t discuss the Holocaust during the 45-58 period because the narrative actually wasn’t that bad for him in that period – his efforts were highly regarded by those who had lived (and particularly survived) the war.
The development of Holocaust studies and hostile propaganda (both Soviet and anti-Catholic) influenced the narrative to the point where it is today.
I suspect that the Concordat was honoured because it was a legitimate legal instrument and renegotiation of terms with the Third Reich would have been extremely difficult and most likely not in the favour of the Church.